Formation, rheology and susceptibility to lipid oxidation of multiple emulsions (O/W/O) in table spreads containing omega-3 rich oils
Sandra P. O’ Dwyer, David O’ Beirne, Déirdre Ní Eidhin, Alan A. Hennessy, Brendan T. O’ Kennedy
LWT
Abstract
Novel multiple emulsion technology was used to enrich spreads (oil-in-water-in-oil, O/W/O, emulsions) with omega-3 rich oils. Effects of oil type (camelina, fish, camelina–fish oil blends) on lipid oxidation (lipid hydroperoxide values; p-Anisidine values), confocal imaging, rheology, and firmness of spreads (75 g/100 g fat), throughout storage at 5 °C, were examined. Fish oil had higher lipid hydroperoxides and p-Anisidine values (p-Avs) than camelina oil (P < 0.05). As the ratio of camelina oil (C) blended with the fish oil (F) was increased (72:28, 85:15, 95:5), lipid hydroperoxides and p-Avs decreased (P < 0.05). Lipid hydroperoxides of spreads increased during storage, whereas p-Avs remained level. When polyunsaturation level of the omega-3 oil incorporated into the spreads was higher, lipid hydroperoxides were unaffected and p-Avs increased. C:F (95:5) and C:F (85:15) spreads had the highest G′ values (P < 0.05), followed by the control spread (no ω-3 oil). Texture analysis showed that C:F (95:5) spread was the hardest (P > 0.05) and C spread (no β-carotene) was the softest (P < 0.05). Omega-3 oils had better oxidative stability when incorporated into double emulsion systems. Camelina spread and spreads containing blends of 15:85 or 5:95 fish oil with camelina oil, maintained adequate sensory acceptability for 8 weeks storage at 5 °C.
Extracted Claims
9 claims extracted from this paper into the knowledge graph
p-Anisidine values remain level during storage in spreads
“Lipid hydroperoxides of spreads increased during storage, whereas p-Avs remained level.”
omega-3 oils have better oxidative stability when incorporated into double emulsion systems
“Omega-3 oils had better oxidative stability when incorporated into double emulsion systems.”
C spread (no β-carotene) is the softest
“Texture analysis showed that C:F (95:5) spread was the hardest (P > 0.05) and C spread (no β-carotene) was the softest (P < 0.05).”